Shisr is the modern name of a location in southern Arabia. There is a sink-hole, well, Arab fort, and the remains of an ancient structure that some feel may be the ancient city of Ubar. The ancient structure was partially excavated by Dr. Juris Zarins (Missouri State University) starting in 1992.

Unfortunately, in February 1992 an article by John Noble was splashed across the front page of the New York Times, declaring that the lost city of Ubar had been discovered. This article was then relayed all around the world and excitement grew. "Guided by ancient maps and sharp-eyed surveys from space" the article claimed "archaeologists and explorers have discovered a lost city deep in the sand of Arabia."

The article claimed that a geologist and specialist in space remote-sensing technology from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California by the name of Dr. Ronald G. Blom, compared maps made by Ptolemy, the Roman historian, with photographs from Landsat space satellites. He hoped that he could identify sites that archeologists could later investigate on the ground. From the Landsat pictures, however, he discovered that there were no ruins of any ancient cities visible. However, because so little changes in the deserts of Oman and Yemen, he could see ancient paths and tracks in the desert. These tracks had persisted for a very long period, and after careful computer processing, the scientists were able to make them out on the Landsat pictures. The ancient tracks acted like a road map. The scientists assumed that where many tracks merged, an ancient city must exist. When the archeologists arrived at the spot that Dr. Blom had pointed out, they indeed discovered ruins in the deserts of Arabia. It was assumed that these ruins were the remains of ancient Ubar.

The truth is, that the expedition was headed up by a group of people, one of them Nicolas Clapp, a world explorer known as Sir Ranulph Fiennes, and an archeologist Dr. Juris Zarins. (See a copy of an interview with him at: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/ubar/zarins/ In his book, Atlantis of the Sands, Fiennes notes that Dr. Zarins commented to him: "The truth is, it was found by hard work, and excavation. The satellite imagery allowed us to eliminate sites so we could concentrate on the most probable areas." Ranulph Fiennes later published his account "Atlantis of the Sands" Bloomsberry 1992 (right) as an effort to correct this misrepresentation. The LandSat photos were helpful, but the camel caravan routes through the desert had been noted many years before. When they started digging at Shisr, near the Arab fort, they began to uncover a large ancient structure. No one was sure what it was, until the article appeared the the New York times. Suddenly the world was convinced that Shisr was Ubar. But is the academic world convinced? To date, no one has published any proof that links the structure at Shisr with Ubar.

Clapp, the author of The Road to Ubar, Finding The Atlantis of the Sands, Houghton Miffin Company, New York, 1998 seems to indicate that he did most of the historical research. He notes on page 41 of his book that Ubar was located on Ptolemy 's Map of the World. Claudius Ptolemy was born in Greece and lived in Egypt around 110-170 AD, and acted as the overseer of the Bibliotheca in Alexandria (Great Library, which had some 750,000 manuscripts). Among them were several "Peripluses" or "round trips" recording coastlines, ports, and something on the lives of people at each stop. (See ptolomaeus.html) Ptolemy knew the world was round, as did the educated world at the time, so Ptolemy constructed a globe of the world, with lines of latitude and longitude. It is unclear whether Ptolemy was the originator of this idea, or if he obtained his information from the Arab merchants that plied the world. In any case, Alexandria was the center of the world, and lines of latitude and longitude were constructed. Medina (known then as Yathrib) was at 71 x 23 degrees . Saba Regio, the royal city of Sheba was at 73 X 16 degrees . Ptolemy's globe was a standard for geographers at that time.

In 391 AD the Roman Emperor Theodosius I looted the library, and burned many of the manuscripts. However, fragments survived after that, and in the late 1400's several printing houses in Europe published maps that were based on Ptolemy's work. (known as Cosmographias). A similar task was undertaken several centuries earlier when Piri Ibn Haji Memmed, otherwise known as Piri Re'is, an Ottoman admiral attempted the same thing. Much of the Piris Ri map was destroyed, especially the eastern part of Asia, but the part with Africa, Europe and North and South America survived.
Clapp notes on page 138 that while exploring the area in southern Arabia he and his team came across a Carpet viper snake, very poisonous and deadly. It reminded them of the snakes mentioned by Diodorus and Strabo, who claimed that the frankincense fields were guarded by very poisonous snakes.

Rather than finding a lost city in the sand, Clapp's expedition discovered a well known watering spot, as the photo on the right illustrates (1959). Bertram Thomas (1931) writes of visiting Shisr, as does Thesiger (1950) . The site was visited in 1953 by Wendell Phillips, The photo on the right was taken in 1959 from the air. When the team of explorers showed up the local people housed them in three new buildings. So much for lost cities under the sands. The ruins at Shisr were not very big, the size of many smaller villages or towns in Nabataea. Thus the team did not at first believe it was Ubar. But once they started digging they began to change their minds. It had what Ubar was supposed to have, towers and a well and ruins! However, most of the center of the fortification had been destroyed by a large sink-hole, apparently formed when an underground cave collapsed.

As I said, while the article in the New York Times seemed to indicate that this was a sensational discovery, the Shisr Fort site was explored much earlier by Bertram Thomas in the 1930s and Thesiger in the 1940's. British officers photographed the area in the 1950s. It was not secluded and unknown. However, the size and the extent of the ruins were not understood until the excavations which began in 1992. Because of the size of the sink-hole, much of the interior of Shisr fort was destroyed. The drawing on the right is based on a drawing made by Dr. Juris Zarins, and demonstrates how the sink-hole destroyed much of the center of the fortification.

Is this the ancient city of Ubar? The ancient city of Ubar is the stuff of legends. When Philby was searching for the lost city of Ubar in the sands of Arabia one of his Bedouin guides sang an old ballad of the lost city that went something like this:

The lost city of Ubar has long been associated with the lost people o f 'Ad. ('Ud). 'Ubar is the name of the land which belonged to Ad in the eastern part of Yemen. Today it is an untrodden desert, owing to the drying up of its water. There are to be found in it great buildings which the wind has smothered in sand. (Nashwan bin Said Himyari, eleventh century).

Unfortunately, the Islamic historians did not know where this lost land was, as is illustrated by the quotes below:

When the fortification at Shisr was uncovered and proclaimed by John Noble to be the lost city of Ubar, joyful Muslims proclaimed that it was just as the Quran described it. But is it? A few fortified walls seem to fall very short of the description in the Quran where it tells us: Have you not considered how your Lord dealt with Ad, Aram, possessors of lofty buildings, (pillars) The like of which were not created in the (other) cities. (Al Fajir 6-8) Is this an accurate description on the ancient Shisr Fort?

Then consider how the people of 'Ad and their city of Ubar was destroyed. The Quran clearly states:

And the 'Ad, they were destroyed by a furious Wind,exceedingly violent; He made it rage against them seven nights and eight days in succession: so that thou couldst see the (whole) people lying prostrate in its (path), as they had been roots of hollow palm-trees tumbled down! Then seest thou any of them left surviving? (Surat al-Haaqqa: 6-8)

One Muslim scholars comments: The wind that destroyed Ubar came from the Wadi alMughith (Al Kisai)

But Shisr fort was destroyed differently. First of all, Shisr Fort was not a full-sized city, but rather a large fortified area. Second, it was destroyed by a sink-hole when the land caved downward due to a collapsing underground cave that was hollowed out by water action. Islamic writings tell us that the people of 'Ad ('Ud) were destroyed by a great wind. According to this evidence, I do find it hard to believe that Shisr is Ubar. 'Ad I believe was in another place, and we will post an article about it in the next couple of months.