In his translation of the Xiyu juan, or "Chapter on the Western Regions" from the Hou Han shu, John Hill proposes in his notes (nos. 12.21 and 12.24) that a trade route used to exist between Petra and Wadi Sirhan to the east. Such a trade route would cross the desert to link Petra directly with Jauf, and subsequently to the trade routes that ran east from there to Gerrha or to the ports at the head of the Persian Gulf. This proposed trade route would have provided a direct link between Gerrha and the more northern ports such as Charax Spasinu on the Persian Gulf, and Gaza and Rhinocorura (modern al-'Arish) on the Mediterranean Sea.
Hill's reason for proposing this new trade route is based on his interpretation of an ancient Chinese manuscript. Throughout Chinese history, Chinese explorers, ambassadors, and merchants made occasional trips to the western world. Many of their reports were written down, and preserved.
The Chinese text that John Hill is referring to is one known as the Wei lue (or 'Short Account of the Wei Dynasty') composed by Yu Huan between 239 and 265 CE. It provides much additional material on Parthia and Da Qin or the Roman Empire than was included in the earlier account of these regions in the Hou Han shu which were based on the reports of the Chinese envoy Gan Ying who reached the Persian Gulf in 97 CE and presented in an address to the Chinese Emperor circa 125 CE. The new material in the Wei lue appears to date from the late 2nd or early 3rd century CE and seems to be based on accounts from Arab, perhaps Nabataean, sources.
According to John Hill, the ancient Chinese text claims that "(from Qielan (Wadi Sirhan) you again travel due west 600 li (250 km) to the kingdom of Sifu (Petra). " Hill is currently working on a revised edition of his annotated translation of the Chapter on the Western Regions from the Hou Han shu, which should be available in a few months. He also hopes to make available a draft edition of his annotated translation of the Wei lue later this year on the Internet.
The basic units of measurement employed in the Hou Han shu, the li and the chi, have varied considerably through the ages and, at times, from district to district. Fortunately, however, they remained stable over the Qin and Han periods and a bronze standard measure, dated 9 AD, has been preserved at the Imperial Palace in Beijing. This has allowed accurate conversions to modern measurements, and the li is calculated to be 415.8 meters in length. Other ancient measurements were the Greek stadium (201.5 meters), the Roman stadium (185 meters), and the Roman mile (1,482 meters.)
There are several problems with the trade route the John Hill has suggested. First, this route does not appear on any maps of ancient trade routes in the Arabian Desert. Such a route would cross a wide desert expanse between Jafr in Jordan and Wadi Sirhan in Saudi Arabia. Secondly, the Chinese text suggests that there was a wang or 'king' of Wadi Sirhan, and as far as we know, Wadi Sirhan has never been a kingdom.
As far as we could tell, any reference to a "king" of this area by the Chinese explorer must have referred to a local sheik. Hill explains it this way: "The Chinese word, "wang", usually translated as "king," is employed for everyone ranging from tribal chiefs to emperors - so there is no difficulty assuming it is used here for "sheik." After the Roman takeover of Nabataea, (106 AD) Roman Forces used to patrol Wadi Sirhan. (Bowersock, Roman Arabia, pp. 155-159, 178; Millar, The Roman Near East pp. 138, 185).
First, any caravan passing through a settled area would have to pay something to the sheik who controlled that area. Settled areas, however, were usually located around water spots, and caravans needed water. The Nabataeans grew in wealth and power, because they developed secret water collection systems in the desert, so that their caravans did not need to pass through areas where they might be taxed.
Second, as civilizations developed and expanded, they started to build forts and taxation centers at various places where caravans might pass. Thus a cat and mouse game developed between caravan owners and those with the power to tax caravans passing through their region.
This constant flux makes it difficult for historians to accurately plot ancient trade routes. While major routes did occur, other routes that bypassed certain centers were used whenever it was profitable.
A New Trade Route
A well would not usually provide this kind of water, unless
it was located in an area with close surface water. Such an area
would have been an oasis, such as was found in Ma'an. If the
caravans were to water in the desert, the watering spot would
need to use a water collection system that fed into a large cistern.
It became obvious that if we wanted to confirm the existence
of a trade route along this path, we needed to locate a major
source of water about half way between Jafr and Wadi Sirhan.
From the map above you can see that the water source is located almost exactly half way between Jafr and Al Isawiyah in Wadi Sirhan. So, it is very possible that there was a caravan route that went directly from Petra to Wadi Sirhan, and then south to Jauf. Imagine finding it via China!
Recently a Nabataea.net reader Antonia Willis kindly sent us pictures of a huge well/cistern in the exact area where the "Roman Pools" or "Ancient cistern" is marked on old maps. The pictures are below.
Above left: The Jafr Depression is a huge, low, flat desert. Near the far side (east) of the depression are a number of low hills as the land rises. (Above right). In these hills, long ago someone created a water collection system that fed a huge underground cistern. The old water collection system has since disappeared, but the huge cistern remains until this day as a witness to the water engineering genius of its builders.
|Who were the ancient Arab Sea Traders?||Alexandria, the center of trade|
|Nabataeans in Italy||Berenice Port on the Red Sea|
|Nabataeans in Africa||Myos Hormos Port on the Red Sea|
|Africa: Juani Island||Leuce Come Port on the Red Sea|
|Africa: Mafia Island||Trade on the Arabian Sea|
|Africa: The Coast of Tanzania||Trade on the Red Sea|
|Nabataeans in India||Nabataeans in the Arab Gulf|
|The Kingdoms of South India||Indian Pottery Found in Petra|
|Arab Ports of Call in India||Trade on the Bay of Bengal|
|Nabataeans and Sri Lanka||Ancient Trade Items|
|The Kingdom of Ruhuna||Nabataeans in Turkey|
|Stone Anchors from Arabia in Sri Lanka||Malacca in Asia|
|Southern Arabia||Dong Song Kingdom in Vietnam|
|Southern Arabia Countryside||African Pottery found in Nabataea|
|Southern Arabia A Caravansary||Nabataean Trade Routes|
|Southern Arabia: The Marib Dam||Nabataeans on Rhodes|
|Southern Arabia Sa'ada (City in the North)||The Ancient Maritime Sea Route|
|Southern ArabiaYemeni Lifestyle||A Proposed New Trade Route Directly East fromPetra|
|Nabataeans in Antartica?||Elephants and the Nabataeans|
|Nabataeans in China||Trade on the China Sea|
|The Spice Route Time Chart (China, India, Arabia, Europe)||Nabataea found in Chinese Texts|
|China: The Li-Kan Question||Chinese Maritime History|
|An overview of Chinese history||The 'West' as mentioned in Chinese historical sources|
|Book Review; 1421 - The Year China Discovered the World|